Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again

Recently, there have been grumblings galore about the relevance of the music review; some say that due to the Internet's facilitation of "listen before you buy," criticism is becoming irrelevant. Obviously, as one that writes for a site named Metal Review, should I have a vested interest in this debate, but I find the argument to be quite absurd. Why? Because I like to read. And I like heavy metal. As long as there are people out there like myself, I don't think job security is an issue. 

Our very own Doug Moore addressed this recently when he was interviewed by Noisecreep, and while I don't necessarily partake in his speculation that our trade is becoming obsolete, his assertion that song-by-song breakdowns and name-dropping should be a thing of the past is dead-on. With the vast amount of metal being produced, the "recommended if you like..." style of reviewing is becoming passe. Good criticism should provoke, not pander. However, the sheer volume of metal and its ease-of-access makes criticism all the more important. In a world where things are becoming ultra-specialized and hyper-segmented, it's important to call people on their bullshit, lest we morph into a society where everything should be accepted as valid in it's own right, regardless of quality. A comment in Moore's recent Defeated Sanity review highlights this danger: someone griped that unless a person is a fan of said sub-subgenre, they have no business criticizing it. These people are products of a pussified generation, where everything they do must be validated and gratification is of utmost importance. 

To be succinct: Fuck that shit. Criticism is more vital than ever, lest we slide into a morass of mediocrity and then accept it as the norm. Therefore, when half-assed crap like this passes for journalism, it's time to light some fires...

 

Decibel 

In an era where hard criticism is dying and "music journalism" consists of little more than re-printed press releases and puff pieces, this embarrassing Blood Revolt review shouldn't be all that surprising; but equating the album to "puffed-up cock-rock" and indiciting an entire genre is poseriffic garbage. Granted, this album has been receiving mixed reviews across the board, but America's only extreme print mag should hold itself to a higher standard. 

 

 

Dax Riggs 

The Acid Bath and Agents of Oblivion vocalist recently released his second (technically fourth) solo record, Say Goodnight to the World, and it's arguably his best effort to date. Bluesy, smoky, and sweltering, it's a welcome oasis from whatever brutal-as-fuck madness you're probably hooked on right now. Also, Rotten Records finally released something decent, a "remaster" (basically, it's louder now) of Acid Bath's classic swansong, Paegan Terrorism Tactics

 

 

Atheist

Everyone's waiting for the progressive death godfathers to take the kids to school when they drop Jupiter. But the band expected to bring some class back into tech death recently displayed a serious lack of it with their very wordy, very contradictory dismissal of bassist Tony Choy, in which they go to great lengths to marginalize his contributions to the band. Save the passive-aggressive bullshit for your next feature in Decibel.

 

 

Cradle of Filth

Peaceville recently launched a microsite for the upcoming CoF platter, entitled...get this...Darkly Darkly Venus Aversa. Thing is, you need to sign up for a mailing list to hear the new song, which kinda defeats the purpose of a microsite. Regardless, the title and cover, combined with the band's track record over the past decade, has fully rendered them little more than a marketing project. Make your money, Dani, but please fuck off when you're done.

 

 

Woe

The Philadelphia black metal entity is now a fully-fleshed band;  their sophomore outing, the excellently-titled Quietly, Undramatically, will see release via Candlelight in October. Despite being hamstrung by a ho-hum production, Quietly should satisfy fans with it's expansion on the blissfully-nihilistic debut, A Spell for the Death of Man. For those unfamiliar, it's time to catch up; expect the hype train to pick up some steam.

 

 

Sahg

Tom Cato Visnes (King ov Hell) continues his descent into crapitude, as the lead single from Sahg III sounds even more neutered and disgustingly-palatable than anything off their sophomore flop. Their first record had a nice, doomy, throwback quality to it (re: "Repent," "Godless Faith"), but it seems that commercial viability is their main goal these days. With King involved, this isn't shocking...it's just a tad disappointing. Wasted potential. 

 

 

Music-Related Fragrances

...as if Axe wasn't repulsive enough. Not only are Christcore cumstains Mychildren Mybride hawking their own stank coating, but some opportunistic weasel is selling Sex Pistols cologne, billing it as "The Scent of Anarchy." I'm all for creative merchandising (honestly, who the fuck needs another cheap-ass black t-shirt?), but this is a recipe for both embarrassment and failure--on both ends of the transaction. Be an adult. Buy some real fucking cologne. 

 

 

John Mellencamp

Admittedly, this is just an excuse to post this photo, which makes him look like the bastard spawn of Larry King and Krang. But his recent comments equating the Internet to the atomic bomb aren't going to go over well with the "Jack and Diane" fans in Japan. (Trivializing the deaths of 246,000 civilians isn't a wise PR move.) And complaining about being a "footnote" compared to the Beatles and Dylan? Um...face the facts, Cougar. 

 

 

[Rev. Jordan Campbell*]

*apologizes for the sporadic publication of this feature. Still expect bi-weekly action, but with publication on Tuesdays or Wednesdays instead of Fridays. Thanks for reading.


Posted Aug 25 2010, 10:20 AM by Rev

Comments

zach wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Wed, Aug 25 2010 1:55 PM

This was an especially good one.

SilverInBlood wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Wed, Aug 25 2010 2:32 PM

Yes! Love the new Dax!

"Fuck that shit." - gold.

diebenny wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Wed, Aug 25 2010 3:15 PM

"the bastard spawn of Larry King and Krang."  Fucking awesome.

theoriginaltp wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Wed, Aug 25 2010 5:26 PM

Great job. And nice gloss about that bit about the post; seems spot on to me.

funeralthirst7 wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Wed, Aug 25 2010 5:36 PM

I didn't know Cradle was still around.

sweetiemuffinsugarplum wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Wed, Aug 25 2010 6:03 PM

Better yet don't buy cologne at all.

scintilla wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Wed, Aug 25 2010 9:55 PM

Ha ha! That was great. Solid. And that Larry King link is horrifying.

hooter wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Wed, Aug 25 2010 10:49 PM

Great opening blurb. I, like many other MR frequents, will agree 100% on the importance of the written review in today's highly specialized day and age. With so much to choose from and so many solid labels out there it is easy to become completely bogged down when trying to find a suitable next purchase. Myspace only offers glimpses into a band and some of us are still hardcore purists and have to be holding the physical copy. Downloading just doesn't cut it for me and thousands of other metal heads out there. Not only do I enjoy reading reviews but I find them essential parts of my day and metal learning curve.

And this is why specialization is so important. Rarely do I see anybody comment on individual writers and their style, but this is by far the most essential tool any reviewer can bring to the table. Here at MR I can seperate Jon Ray from Doug Moore from Jordan Campbell all based on the way you guys write - and that, to me, is wonderful. It's a sign that you're doing something right. Luckily this site also offers you enough space to express yourselves in such a manner with the reviews you pen. Zines don't have this same luxury, and I often don't identify with the writers in nearly the same way.

The latest Decibel is perhaps the most glaring example of this - and I'm citing that Blood Revolt review in particular. It was written by Leah Sottile - a name I do not recognize, have not looked into, and have no confidence in whatsoever. Decibel has writers pop up in their pages way more often than others, and these writers have built reputations with me similar to the guys here at MR: Adem Tepedelen, Andrew Bonazelli, Jeanne Fury, Kevin Stewart-Panko, etc. While I don't always agree with everything they write, I recognize and respect what they are saying in the extremely limited space they have to work with.

Unfortunately, this Blood Revolt issue happens to be something I've been finding with Decibel as of late; a writer I'm unfamiliar with delivering a review I'm very unsure of. This just happens to be a part of the game, something you have to watch out for. And it is because of this that I go to multiple sources for my reviews and latch on to those very important said writers whom I trust. In this case it was with Mr. Campbell's review that I ultimately sided with because that is the one I have learned to become more comfortable with.

Let Mr. Moore know that reviewers are not a dying breed. It is very true that as long as there are people like me out there, you guys will always have a place in this world. Amazing write up, amazing feature. Thanks for provoking thought and bringing smiles to a bunch of neanderthal's faces.

Cheers! (sorry for the rant, but this read really got me going)

Jishwa wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Thu, Aug 26 2010 1:37 AM

"In a world where things are becoming ultra-specialized and hyper-segmented, it's important to call people on their bullshit, lest we morph into a society where everything should be accepted as valid in it's own right, regardless of quality."

Amen brotha. Couldn't agree more. And Dax Riggs rules. Great segment Rev, might be the best yet.

greigoroth wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Thu, Aug 26 2010 6:52 AM

What hooter said.

Phantom Green wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Thu, Aug 26 2010 9:00 AM

Say goodnight to the world has yet to leave my player since my pre order arrived. thanks for giving him a mention. And you are absolutely right about it being his best solo effort yet!!! Keep up the good work. And fuck you Mellencamp!

Jishwa wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Thu, Aug 26 2010 10:45 AM

Definitely don't think it's Dax's best work yet, but it's very very good for sure and has gotten better with each listen. Nothing tops If This is Hell Then I'm Lucky.

mst wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Thu, Aug 26 2010 9:18 PM

Reviewer a dead fish, no, that's absurd. Most music these days are total crap, and I hate listening hours to crap to find some gems.

I was going to lash at you about Cradle Of Filth, but remember that they have been only half good during the past decade... and since their last album was a good one, no surprising this song hidden by marketing trick is horrible, a nightmare, but all in the wrong way.

grymmbear wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Fri, Aug 27 2010 7:12 AM

My $.02 (like it even mattered):

Decibel:  Agreed on your point of the review (it's a solid record), though Decibel is usually a very well-written magazine.  Fuck, Ula FUCKIN' Gehret writes for it now!

Dax Riggs:  The man is amazing.  Hands-down my favorite vocalist, and one of the best songwriters out there.

Atheist:  Great band, but their recent comments have knocked themselves down several pegs in my eyes.

And on an unrelated note:  Nothing on the Dimmu Borgir/Snowy Shaw drama?  Quite amazed! ;)

Octomac wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Fri, Aug 27 2010 12:39 PM

Hah...  "Face the facts, Cougar."  I got a kick out of that one.

Rev wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Fri, Aug 27 2010 12:49 PM

@gymmbear:

Regarding dB: That's the root of my disdain. There are some excellent writers on that staff, and we should expect higher quality.

As for Snowy Shaw? He probably quit over a wardrobe dispute.

And everyone's .02 matters 'round these parts.

Stalker wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Sat, Aug 28 2010 9:15 AM

I was going to say something about Decibel's barometer, but glad it was posted. BR getting 4 for 'not coming together' is pretty laughable. Not showing the score, the verbiage of said review implies a 7 anyway. And their Ensiferum review last yr giving a 3 reaffirmed their jackassary formula.

Stalker wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Sat, Aug 28 2010 9:22 AM

Lastly, I read the Atheist comment, and I think people are being too hard on Schaeffer. He obviously put the band in a bind, and they did thank him for his service, not to mention keep the flame of remembrance alive for Patterson. Sure, it could have been handled more tactfully, but hurt feelings can cause one to be pretty blunt. After almost 20 yrs of knowing one another, I am sure the band felt betrayed. Therefore, I don't knock 'em down a peg for it.

Karl J wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Sat, Aug 28 2010 12:08 PM

Honest question:  what does a publication (online or print) do in a case like that where a recording just didn't do anything for a particular reviewer?  Do you fish around for a review that agrees wtih one's perspective as an editor?  

If one of the MR guys just didn't 'get' an album that is widely acclaimed (say the Chasm disc from last year), would you automatically recuse yourself from reviewing it, or would your alternate opinion be welcomed?  I know that alternate opinions are expressed daily on the forums - but would you alter your actual review process for such an event?  

Rev wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Sat, Aug 28 2010 2:27 PM

@Karl J:

That's a good question. Obviously, I can only speak for MR, but there's no executive decisions that are made regarding perspective. The final opinion doesn't really matter, love it or hate it. It's the way a writer articulates the opinion that's important.

Also, we aren't assigned albums to review; we volunteer for them on a first-come basis. If a Christian metalcore album pops up in queue, I'm probably going to ignore it. Instead, I'll gravitate towards something I'm genuinely interested in. An analogy: If you're a White Sox beat reporter, you're going to be quite knowledgeable about baseball in general, but you're probably not going to be able to give adequate insight into the Marlins' farm system. Hence, you provide your readers with the best content possible by focusing on your strengths. Winging it would be a disservice to your audience and your career.

Additionally, things like this should come up in the hiring process, which is quite stringent around here. The only time we've sent someone back to the drawing board (since I've been on staff, anyway), it was regarding the presentation of his opinion, not his final conclusion. That person is no longer on staff.

theoriginaltp wrote re: Reverend's Bazaar - F**k Commerce, Again
on Sat, Aug 28 2010 4:01 PM

@ Rev/Karl-- Thanks for the question and the answer. I've been wondering about that for some time. Glad to see an answer to that question.